In the realm of professional wrestling, Roman Reigns has undoubtedly etched his name as one of the greatest of all time, solidifying his status as the Tribal Chief since his triumphant return in 2020. Reigns, however, has recently come under scrutiny for his shockingly low number of matches in 2023, a mere 11 bouts. This scarcity of in-ring appearances has ignited a debate within the wrestling community, prompting both criticism and a staunch defense from none other than WWE Hall of Famer, Booker T.
On a recent episode of the Hall of Fame podcast, Booker T addressed the chatter surrounding Reigns’ limited matches, drawing parallels to wrestling legends from the golden age of WWE. The Hall of Famer cited Hulk Hogan, an iconic figure, and how infrequent matches did not hinder his status as a larger-than-life personality.
“You know, people are gonna find something to complain about all the time. I think one of the biggest complaints was guys work too much… Go back to the old days and just think about how many times Hogan worked on television in a calendar year. Might be less than that, and nobody was bigger than Hogan… Can you imagine a boxer boxing 22 times in a year? Or an MMA fighter fighting 22 times in a year? 22 times is actually a lot. That’s just the way I look at it. So I look at the pros and cons of it. If Roman wasn’t selling no tickets, we could talk.”
Booker T’s comparison to Hogan’s era, where the scarcity of appearances did not diminish a wrestler’s star power, offers a perspective that challenges the modern expectation of frequent in-ring performances. However, it’s worth noting that Booker T’s statement incorrectly credits Reigns with 22 matches in 2023 when, in reality, the Tribal Chief has only participated in 11.
- Advertisement -
The controversy surrounding Reigns’ limited matches takes an interesting turn as the WWE Hall of Famer suggests that the focus should not solely be on quantity but rather on the impact and drawing power of each appearance. The comparison to combat sports like boxing and MMA adds another layer to the discussion, emphasizing the toll that frequent competition can take on an athlete’s longevity and overall appeal.
Despite the defense from Booker T, some critics argue that Reigns’ sporadic appearances may not be sustainable in the long run, potentially impacting the momentum of storylines and the overall entertainment value for fans. As the Tribal Chief plans a temporary hiatus from the squared circle, the looming question remains: how will this strategic approach to wrestling affect Reigns’ standing in the WWE hierarchy?
Adding fuel to the discussion, an ex-WWE star has claimed that feuding with Roman Reigns can have career-damaging consequences. This assertion raises concerns about the potential fallout for those who find themselves in the crosshairs of the Tribal Chief’s dominance, emphasizing the high stakes involved in working with one of the industry’s most formidable figures.
The uncertainty surrounding Reigns’ return to WWE television further intensifies the debate, leaving fans and pundits alike speculating on the implications of his strategic approach to wrestling. Whether this limited match schedule is a calculated move to preserve Reigns’ longevity or a potential risk for his continued dominance remains to be seen.
- Advertisement -
As the wrestling world awaits Roman Reigns’ next move, one thing is certain – the controversy surrounding his minimal matches in 2023 has ignited a broader conversation about the evolving expectations in professional wrestling and the delicate balance between quantity and impact in the world of sports entertainment.