Since Triple H assumed a more prominent role in WWE’s creative process, following Vince McMahon’s resignation as TKO Executive Chairman, noticeable differences have emerged both for the audience and the talent. While the changes have been evident to fans, Becky Lynch sheds light on how the transition has impacted the wrestlers themselves.
In her interview with Adam Silverstein on Getting Over, Becky Lynch delves into the significant disparities she experienced while working under Vince McMahon versus Triple H in WWE, offering valuable insights from a talent’s perspective. One of the most striking disparities Lynch highlights is the element of consistency.
Under Vince McMahon’s leadership, Lynch explains that there was often a lack of consistency in how talents were utilized and portrayed on television. McMahon’s approach to storytelling could sometimes result in abrupt changes in direction or character arcs, leaving talents uncertain about their roles and futures within the company. This inconsistency could be frustrating for wrestlers who were trying to establish themselves and connect with the audience.
On the other hand, Lynch notes that working under Triple H’s leadership, particularly in NXT, provided a more consistent and structured environment for talents. Triple H’s approach to talent development and storytelling allowed for clearer character development and more stable career trajectories. Wrestlers in NXT often had more defined roles and storylines, which provided them with a greater sense of direction and purpose.
Overall, Lynch’s insights shed light on the different approaches to talent management and creative direction within WWE, highlighting the importance of consistency in fostering talent growth and success in the highly competitive world of professional wrestling.
Under McMahon’s reign, the backstage atmosphere was often characterized by chaos, with plans subject to last-minute alterations, sometimes even as events unfolded live on air. This unpredictability created a stressful environment for performers, leaving them uncertain about the direction of their storylines. However, with Triple H at the helm, Lynch emphasizes a shift towards order and stability.
“Consistency. I think that is the name of the game,” Lynch remarks, highlighting Triple H’s penchant for long-term planning and execution. Unlike McMahon’s tendency to pivot abruptly, Triple H maintains a steadfast vision for storylines, ensuring they are seen through to fruition. This commitment to continuity has contributed to a more cohesive viewing experience for audiences, with storylines unfolding organically over time.
Indeed, WWE’s recent success stories, such as The Bloodline’s dominance, Gunther’s Intercontinental Championship reign, and Bayley’s gradual babyface turn, are testament to the effectiveness of long-term storytelling under Triple H’s leadership.
However, Lynch also acknowledges the delicate balance between heeding audience feedback and adhering to creative vision. While it’s essential to listen to the audience’s desires, she emphasizes the importance of staying true to the overarching narrative, even if it means diverging from immediate fan expectations.
As Lynch embarks on her own long-term storyline, culminating in a high-stakes showdown against Rhea Ripley at WrestleMania 40, she epitomizes the fusion of talent and storytelling prowess that defines WWE’s new era under Triple H’s guidance.
As WrestleMania approaches, Lynch’s journey serves as a testament to the transformative power of consistency and vision in shaping WWE’s narrative landscape, promising audiences a riveting spectacle fueled by passion and purpose.
